Re: [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]

From: Robert Schaefer at 300 < >
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 14:21:27 +0000


The number one, two, and three issues are that private companies:
  1. don't want their dirty laundry aired in public.
  2. don't want to be told what to do or how to do it
  3. don't really care unless there was some legal reason to care, and even then don't really care

-Subject: Re: [SystemSafety] Qualifying SW as "proven in use" [Measuring Software]
-
-Peter,
-
-> Getting this evidence is pretty tricky, as parallel developments for the
-> same project won't happen.
-
-NASA spends hundreds of millions to take a few snaps of a distant
-planet, we need software engineering researchers with some vision
-and drive (and connections).

.
.
.

-For a lot less than $25 million an experiment comparing developers
-allowed to use a particular XYZ vs. those not allowed to use XYZ
-could be run.

--

Derek M. Jones                  tel: +44 (0) 1252 520 667
Knowledge Software Ltd          blog:shape-of-code.coding-guidelines.com
Software analysis               http://www.knosof.co.uk
_______________________________________________
The System Safety Mailing List
systemsafety_at_xxxxxx

The System Safety Mailing List
systemsafety_at_xxxxxx Received on Fri Jun 21 2013 - 16:21:43 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Feb 16 2019 - 07:17:05 CET