Re: [SystemSafety] Fwd: Contextualizing & Confirmation Bias

From: Derek M Jones < >
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 14:53:21 +0000


> Recent NYT article on the scientific method and confirmation bias in
> experiments in the hard sciences for those who are still interested
in this
> topic:

There are several themes playing out here. Some of the underlying problems being:

    o lots of monkeys, or researchers, running experiments and only those with better than 5% statistical significance getting published, "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False"

    o researchers have a hard time publishing negative results, so once something is out there it can remain as received wisdom for a long time

    o journals tend to be more interested in publishing new research and not replications of previously published work.

The fact that experimental data tends not to be kept very long is another problem for those of us interested in checking past results:

Some of Physics' famous experiments, e.g., Millikan's oil drop experiment had a great deal of confirmation bias built into their original reporting:

I did see a photograph of a page in Millikan's original notebook that showed exactly what he had done with his data, but cannot find the link.

Derek M. Jones                  tel: +44 (0) 1252 520 667
Knowledge Software Ltd
Software analysis     
The System Safety Mailing List
Received on Wed Feb 05 2014 - 15:53:49 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Jun 04 2019 - 21:17:06 CEST