Re: [SystemSafety] Re(Hamburg experiences: Change of passenger warnings on Hamburg subway from today.

From: RICQUE Bertrand (SAGEM DEFENSE SECURITE) < >
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:15:19 +0100


We see the same behaviour here in France between automated and not automated lines, while we have beeps everywhere. People know where it is automated and apparently "fear" the machine...

Bertrand Ricque
Program Manager
Optronics and Defence Division
Sights Program
Mob : +33 6 87 47 84 64
Tel : +33 1 59 11 96 82
Bertrand.ricque_at_xxxxxx

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 12:13 PM To: Steve Tockey
Cc: systemsafety_at_xxxxxx Subject: [SystemSafety] Re(Hamburg experiences: Change of passenger warnings on Hamburg subway from today.

Steve, we have now in Hamburg TWO different warning systems:

     one  - the underground or "U-Bahn" - now without any oral
        announcement and just a beep sequence during door closing,
     and one - the rapid rail system or "S-Bahn"- with oral
        announcement followed by few beeps when doors close
        automagically.

My observation (even yesterday upon returning from Berlin) is that passengers with the 2nd system (oral plus beeps) try to board the train at last second during the oral warning. Possibly they still think that the oral announcement is given by some natural person which can oversee the situation and that doors are closed only after their permission (btw: this personalized warning is still practiced at some central subway stations during rush hours also presently!). I have not observed such attempts to board the train after beeping started (possibly as people know that this automagic mechanism is not as flexible as with human surveillance)

Of course: I have no statistical data supporting my suspicions.

Best wishes: Klaus (February 19, 2014)

Zitat von Steve Tockey <Steve.Tockey_at_xxxxxx

>
> I doubt seriously this is going to make any difference. I frequent
> subway systems around the world: Beijing, Shanghai, San Francisco's
> BART, Washington DC Metro, Paris Metro, Tube in London, etc. In all
> cases, whether the "doors closing" warning is verbal or beeps, it
> simply doesn't matter. The frequency of someone getting stuck in a
> closing door is the same everywhere. So while they may think it will
> make a difference, in practice it won't. What they need to do is
> adjust their schedule to allow for a certain percentage of such delays
> and just go with that. They will have to deal with the delays no matter what...
>
>
> -- steve
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Karsten Loer <k.loer_at_xxxxxx > Date: Monday, February 17, 2014 12:58 AM
> To: "systemsafety_at_xxxxxx > <systemsafety_at_xxxxxx > Subject: [SystemSafety] Change of passenger warnings on Hamburg subway
> from today.
>
> Dear colleagues,
>
> after having enjoyed the inspiring discussions on this list for
> several years now, mainly passively, I think I can contribute an
> interesting topic
> today:
>
> Hochbahn, the operating company of Hamburg subway, decided that from
> today on the natural language warnings ?zurueckbleiben bitte? (?stay
> clear from the train?), which used to warn passengers about closing
> doors of the train that is imminent to depart, will be replaced by a series of beeps.
>
> Warnings are broadcast at the end of the stop, and are initiated by
> the driver after she/he has checked (by means of a set of monitors
> that are installed in the cockpit and/or in an area of the platform
> where the front of the train comes to a hold) that all doors are clear of passengers.
>
> The old warnings, which had been in operation for several decades,
> consisted of a natural language message that was broadcasted via the
> public announcement system of the subway station. For newer train
> (series
> DT4 and DT5) this was a recording in a friendly and polite female
> voice, for the older DT3 train series these messages were read out by
> the train driver at each stop (? so as a side effect travellers were
> able to learn a lot about the train driver?s gender, nationality and current mood).
> These warning messages were complemented by a series of short beeps at
> the train doors.
>
> The new warnings are just an extended series of short beeps at the
> train doors.
>
> The justification given by Hochbahn is as follows:
>
> Apparently, over the years some people were conditioned to interpret
> the old natural language warnings to stay clear of the train as a
> prompt to speed up an try to get into the train.
>
> As a consequence, people would get trapped in train doors; with a
> potential of causing injuries to themselves and delays to the train
> (in the new DT4 and DT5 train series the doors will open
> automatically, if a certain degree of resistance is detected during
> the closing process; in the old DT3 trains the doors need to be opened
> by the train driver, if she/he becomes aware of the problem via video screen).
>
> This causes a delay at the station. As a consequence, trains need to
> go faster to catch up with the timetable. This, in turn yield an
> increase of power consumption which accumulates to up to 700.000?
> (about 1 Million
> USD) per year. (Well, from personal experience asa frequent traveller
> on these trains, I would have thought the main concern of faster going
> trains would the safety of standing passengers who tend to bounce back
> an forth due to the higher accelerations; but that matter is not
> mentioned anywhere in the press statement.)
>
> In summary, I see three arguments that are raised by the operator to
> justify the need for the change of warning announcements:
>
> (1) preventing passengers from getting trapped in doors of a train
> that is about to leave,
> (2) reducing the frequency of disturbances of the time schedule, as a
> consequence of (1), hence, allowing trains on route to travel at lower
> velocity and
> (3) saving costs if operations as a consequence of (2).
>
> As a safety analyst and concerned passenger I would like to add to
> this list of arguments: (4) increasing the level of comfort/reducing
> the potential of falls of standing passengers as a consequence of (2)
>
>
> Perhaps there are other experts on this list who also doubt that
> changing the warnings from a combination of spoken platform
> announcements and audio-signals on the train to just audio-signals on
> the train will have the desired effect?
>
> I wonder how long it will take for people to adapt their habits and
> react the door signal alone (Pavlov-effect)?
>
> Maybe it is also worth thinking about the side conditions:
> The subway trains in Hamburg operate very frequently and reliably;
> usually every 3-5 mins during the peak times (7am through 9pm), and
> every 10 mins at nighttime.
> So one might wonder why people are prepared to take the risk of
> getting injured despite the next train arriving soon.
>
> I wonder if people?s behavior would be likely to change if the
> imminent arrival of the next train would be made visible, e.g. as is
> done on London underground (although I am not sure if the motivation might be different).
> In Hamburg this information is only displayed AFTER the current train
> has left the platform.
>
> Many greetings from Hamburg!
>
> Dr. Karsten Loer
>
> Dr. Loer system safety consulting
> http://www.dr-loer.eu
> _______________________________________________
> The System Safety Mailing List
> systemsafety_at_xxxxxx >
> _______________________________________________
> The System Safety Mailing List
> systemsafety_at_xxxxxx >



The System Safety Mailing List
systemsafety_at_xxxxxx #
" Ce courriel et les documents qui lui sont joints peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles, être soumis aux règlementations relatives au contrôle des exportations ou ayant un caractère privé. S'ils ne vous sont pas destinés, nous vous signalons qu'il est strictement interdit de les divulguer, de les reproduire ou d'en utiliser de quelque manière que ce soit le contenu. Toute exportation ou réexportation non autorisée est interdite Si ce message vous a été transmis par erreur, merci d'en informer l'expéditeur et de supprimer immédiatement de votre système informatique ce courriel ainsi que tous les documents qui y sont attachés."

" This e-mail and any attached documents may contain confidential or proprietary information and may be subject to export control laws and regulations. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, copying of this e-mail and any attachments thereto or use of their contents by any means whatsoever is strictly prohibited. Unauthorized export or re-export is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please advise the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and all attached documents from your computer system." #

The System Safety Mailing List
systemsafety_at_xxxxxx Received on Wed Feb 19 2014 - 12:16:13 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Apr 26 2019 - 00:17:06 CEST