Re: [SystemSafety] Claims for formal methods

From: C. Michael Holloway < >
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 07:46:07 -0500

Not that my opinion need matter much, but I concur fully with Mr. Raftery. Editing the archive is a blight on the integrity of the list. In some ways, doing so seems worse to me than anything Mr. Jones wrote.

On 2/19/14 6:08 PM, Heath Raftery wrote:
> ...
> That would be a real blight on the impartiality of this list. You're
> entitled to censor the service as you wish, but removing criticism of the
> establishment would represent a dramatic drop in the integrity I perceive
> this resource to present.
> I'm not going to put up any fight, but wanted to offer a different
> viewpoint to your own.
> Heath
> _______________________________________________
> The System Safety Mailing List
> systemsafety_at_xxxxxx >

C. Michael Holloway, speaking only for himself and not his organiztion


_______________________________________________ The System Safety Mailing List systemsafety_at_xxxxxx
Received on Thu Feb 20 2014 - 13:46:27 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Jun 04 2019 - 21:17:06 CEST