On 16/07/2014 11:10, Andrew Rae wrote:
> Standards processes seldom have an easy way for people outside the
> immediate process to say "You're whole approach to this is wrong".
> They're much more suited to complaining about how specific bits are
> expressed, on the assumption that the overall framework makes sense.
Is that intentional, do you think? It sounds like a good defence mechanism.
Rob
-- Dr Rob Alexander Lecturer in High Integrity Systems Engineering Department of Computer Science The University of York, Deramore Lane, York, YO10 5GH, UK Tel: 01904 325474 Fax: 01904 325599 http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/~rda/ Disclaimer --- http://www.york.ac.uk/docs/disclaimer/email.htm _______________________________________________ The System Safety Mailing List systemsafety_at_xxxxxxReceived on Wed Jul 16 2014 - 12:45:50 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun Feb 17 2019 - 16:17:07 CET