Re: [SystemSafety] Statistical Assessment of SW ......

From: Martyn Thomas < >
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 18:25:40 +0000


Different indeed.

And, of course, wholly spurious.

But that's a different discussion.

Martyn

On 26/01/2015 11:41, DREW Rae wrote:
> Caveat: As Les made clear, it's a very different kettle of fish to say
> "I'll accept your system as adequate if you follow these methods" than
> to say "I'll accept your claim about a particular reliability based on
> following these methods".



The System Safety Mailing List
systemsafety_at_xxxxxx Received on Mon Jan 26 2015 - 19:25:54 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Feb 20 2019 - 20:17:06 CET