[SystemSafety] Software reliability (or whatever you would prefer to call it)

From: Martyn Thomas < >
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 09:55:44 +0000

I'm puzzled by much of this discussion. Consider this common example:

A company creates a software package and submits it for beta testing by a group of users. Assume that the package reports how often it is used and for how long, and the users report all errors they encounter. Assume there is a single instance of the software on a server that all the users use.

The company corrects some of the errors that are reported.

The company calculates some measure of the amount of usage before failure. Call it MTBF.

The MTBF is observed to increase.

What word shall we use to describe the property of the software that is increasing?

I'd call it "reliability". If you would, too, then how can software reliability not exist?

I don't mind if you want to use a different word to describe the property. Let's just agree one, do a global replace in the offending standards and move on ...

... to discussing a practical upper bound on the "reliability" that can be assessed in this way - and on the assumptions that should be made explicit before using any such assessment as a prediction of future performance.


The System Safety Mailing List
systemsafety_at_xxxxxx Received on Fri Mar 06 2015 - 10:55:55 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Feb 23 2019 - 09:17:07 CET