Re: [SystemSafety] Categorising "errors" [was: Stupid Software Errors]

From: Peter Bernard Ladkin < >
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 17:07:26 +0200

Hash: SHA256

On 2015-05-05 13:46 , C. Michael Holloway wrote:
> On 5/4/15 7:21 PM, Drew Rae wrote:

>> Does anyone else find it remarkable that a company is publicly releasing information about a 
>> potential problem with a system, .....

> Yes, I find it remarkable. Getting such information from companies has usually been very hard,
> even with confidentiality and anonymity agreements in place. Rather than lamenting the
> stupidity of programmers, I'm inclined to be celebrating the (rare) openness of the lawyers.

Say I have just discovered a 2038-type "feature" in an airborne system I have delivered. If I tell the regulator who issues a maintenance AD which says reboot the systems regularly, then I don't have to fix it, in fact I don't have to do anything else at all. Furthermore, if someone falls prey to it, it's now their deal for not complying with the AD and no longer my deal for building the "feature" in.

PBL Prof. Peter Bernard Ladkin, Faculty of Technology, University of Bielefeld, 33594 Bielefeld, Germany Je suis Charlie
Tel+msg +49 (0)521 880 7319

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVSNyuAAoJEIZIHiXiz9k+M7cH/RSqEak9SgZid48IfWhZnyYC YK4qsC+qPbe0aHrDwd9CGxFIw4FelVZNfTp3ULOd7gmM0HtBLBY2P59XpO5681h+ UJJ86ON8oDLei383QSEJwV3SU8yewpqNMnR2R10ivDt3tALpTi/ZJAGDRdkwKVMF HMeoAJFh4EX+Nh13JVTx/JixeLzofjNhFNVw81jUaEhA4lMVGslAGrrn9Lgzi/t/ HnYv/+HU5+xnTEQwrEC5Wl9WNg5Aqn7gbNioTPK/XKU6Z/EM5PxGjqjCoU+9eIFL zhINtdFqrN+vUfm49KZ851uKPMH0Pum9D7fjJH6URy0HT5/kt9Wsgaz2VznaVow= =f0JT

The System Safety Mailing List
systemsafety_at_xxxxxx Received on Tue May 05 2015 - 17:07:35 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Jun 04 2019 - 21:17:07 CEST