Re: [SystemSafety] Another unbelievable failure (file system overflow)

From: Chris Hills < >
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 14:50:49 +0100

-----Original Message-----
From: systemsafety-bounces_at_xxxxxx
[mailto:systemsafety-bounces_at_xxxxxx Robert Schaefer at 300
Sent: 28 May 2015 13:46
To: systemsafety_at_xxxxxx Subject: Re: [SystemSafety] Another unbelievable failure (file system overflow)

Static analysis isn't free. Testing isn't free. Who determines the need for or business case for static analysis and test?
[CAH] normally (every report I have seen) static analysis saves a lot of
time and money.
The same is true of structured testing.

As to "Bad Manager / Good Programmer", or "Good Manager / Bad Programmer". Who works for whom?
[CAH] Both work for the company as part of a team.
There is no us and them.


The System Safety Mailing List
systemsafety_at_xxxxxx Received on Thu May 28 2015 - 15:50:59 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Jun 04 2019 - 21:17:07 CEST