Re: [SystemSafety] Another unbelievable failure (file system overflow)

From: Peter Bernard Ladkin < >
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 06:48:12 +0200


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 2015-05-28 23:43 , Heath Raftery wrote:
> .... Buying and applying static analysis, even if it is cheaper in the long run, is always seen
> as less attractive than paying labour to deal with the consequences later.

That "always" must be specific to your industry sector and your region.

PBL Prof. Peter Bernard Ladkin, Faculty of Technology, University of Bielefeld, 33594 Bielefeld, Germany Je suis Charlie
Tel+msg +49 (0)521 880 7319 www.rvs.uni-bielefeld.de

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVZ++MAAoJEIZIHiXiz9k+eSgH/1j3ADZi7krH7ZXs4XirdegD 6SYVAWhL6BhJYi4hJniYN3ba8Klq6zr4+Oe4jhzBxzu9b3Zfx4qkdtJH0uEue7co ichVACG+fBc4HPgCKGlrGauVc1DgyrkFGU4ybYEIB6oGp8XySG5/XFRups8GBTe9 S7gsdNnKRmSnI5WC2SG0axMm8TK7aWrTBWswASFuizS40eSxLQVO0KpVDCM8oy4u DCbXmaMjfOei4DUXk7kPvAGv14+nVPLNf/66QFt4EY30gJmX2kkI5vZ56m34y619 ra1QisWtySVKd6DCmw4iw3CIXoPjCxkcYZrL7CcZbA7glZa2cQqYaJEGFbDL1dU= =C50I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



The System Safety Mailing List
systemsafety_at_xxxxxx Received on Fri May 29 2015 - 06:48:21 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Apr 19 2019 - 13:17:07 CEST