Re: [SystemSafety] Another unbelievable failure (file system overflow)

From: Heath Raftery < >
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 16:04:18 +1000


On 29/05/2015 2:48 PM, Peter Bernard Ladkin wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
>
>
> On 2015-05-28 23:43 , Heath Raftery wrote:
>> .... Buying and applying static analysis, even if it is cheaper in the long run, is always seen
>> as less attractive than paying labour to deal with the consequences later.
>
> That "always" must be specific to your industry sector and your region.

I hope so. And even more specific than that, hopefully.



The System Safety Mailing List
systemsafety_at_xxxxxx Received on Fri May 29 2015 - 08:04:33 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Apr 25 2019 - 04:17:07 CEST