Re: [SystemSafety] Another unbelievable failure (file system overflow)

From: Matthew Squair < >
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 18:09:16 +1000


Much like those hobbyist sailors who build their own boat, take it out into the deep blue and suddenly find out that it's not quite as good as they thought.

And it's a hell of a long way for the coast guard helicopter to fly for pickup...

Matthew Squair

MIEAust, CPEng
Mob: +61 488770655
Email; Mattsquair_at_xxxxxx
Web: http://criticaluncertainties.com

On 28 May 2015, at 10:56 pm, Peter Bernard Ladkin < ladkin_at_xxxxxx

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Hash: SHA256

On 2015-05-28 14:46 , Robert Schaefer at 300 wrote:

Static analysis isn't free. Testing isn't free. Who determines the need for  or business case

for static analysis and test?

In Britain some of us would argue it is determined by the Code of Conduct you signed up to when
joining your professional association, usually BCS or IET.

I guess the point of saying that LightSail is essentially a "hobby" is a subtext that says "so we
didn't do that stuff" .... along with the further subtext that says "...but we sure wish now we had!"

PBL Prof. Peter Bernard Ladkin, Faculty of Technology, University of Bielefeld, 33594 Bielefeld, Germany
Je suis Charlie
Tel+msg +49 (0)521 880 7319 www.rvs.uni-bielefeld.de

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVZxBxAAoJEIZIHiXiz9k+t5oH/3fvK5Ws/AI/Cfn7CEc0uJeP kn8UN+4Ukixgc7Sig6IKG5D3LtkM1ojCzM78TuILHg011BHg87FUb6UeDBxsiFAn 15rP1aoSYzwJjYvhJGz4dUOY6SSLbrUJ2r3jchjQv1oJhTSzTUR2IDdmc3KT6qUJ Uij8oOyC8mbW9yGLEVFDq4/qoq4ZU7sU9StSbDz3hahACZD/ea4z7s8S83Y0hYt+ g71bNWVrO8a1nifv+bFN7mcG9N6Ka/lfbywIp+YRc/KHbHwf8Kw0Ng1EdfyQtDlX IrkxebNd218SrJxnCpM7WD5/m83WOyhwxUsvezPleLlDRjrLx1WnAdSr1Mnwo8E= =GYLv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



The System Safety Mailing List
systemsafety_at_xxxxxx


The System Safety Mailing List
systemsafety_at_xxxxxx Received on Fri May 29 2015 - 10:09:27 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Apr 22 2019 - 20:17:07 CEST