Re: [SystemSafety] Floods and Electrics

From: Dominey, Alan (UK) < >
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 15:21:46 +0000

It should of course be noted that before failure of said pumps through water ingress, the local authority decided that the best course of action was to open the barrier and release the Foss floodwaters into the Ouse (on the grounds that they would not be able to do so if the pumps failed) thereby negating the entire intended flood protection plan for central York . . .

-----Original Message-----

Sent: 28 December 2015 11:43
To: The System Safety List
Subject: [SystemSafety] Floods and Electrics

----------------------! WARNING ! ---------------------- This message originates from outside our organisation, either from an external partner or from the internet.
Consider carefully whether you should click on any links, open any attachments or reply. Follow the 'Report Suspicious Emails' link on IT matters for instructions on reporting suspicious email messages.


Hash: SHA256

In an article in the Guardian about the floods in York, at , I read about the flood barrier on the River Foss that

[begin quote]

Problems arose at the weekend at the Foss barrier and pumping station, which controls river levels by managing the interaction between the rivers Foss and Ouse. In a model that is commonplace around the country, pumps behind the barrier are supposed to pump the water clear. The station became inundated with floodwater after the volume exceeded the capacity of the pumps and flooded some of the electrics, according to an Environment Agency spokesperson, who said that a helicopter was due to airlift in parts to complete repairs on Monday.

[end quote]

It is particularly ironic that flood-control measures are rendered ineffective through flooding of their controls. But it's not a one-off.

At the beginning of this month, much of the city of Lancaster (and reportedly 55,000 people) were left without power when an electricity substation in Caton Road was flooded in a previous storm

Roger Kemp's take on the Lancaster affair is at

There is more to consider. Lots more.

I have a few more words at

PBL Prof. Peter Bernard Ladkin, Faculty of Technology, University of Bielefeld, 33594 Bielefeld, Germany Je suis Charlie Tel+msg +49 (0)521 880 7319

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWgSBSAAoJEIZIHiXiz9k+GJwH/RvbEtRJV3LIIA0qb07eH4Bl IOBvoFygTLKLgb4nHjkoD3N+Dv++nlPi6ydCbHZhCs1rTy/V+g6e2VypNQINXB6c bDtZwEIvirtUx1u6AMSA3n2CoKVj4gwNhzRBcSvnPe9BJ97gwf0/TzmCnanBzdFT TN3dXg4hDiKDatD8DVWdZMgyJ5xUthyQzTxHS6VWkqZY0DHzt5H14g+0iZAoaiAr Q4PHsN5jkKi0x6XU7lXEE280RLndHU3rUagvQ3qRMoFJTIGTVgmhZTODlSrOX8MS WNReKpVwdsKEqk2YkK56Wab2fx7Tels/Ou4Z2S8EZLDt4AL8plnHYVzxUklIpRM= =9pMq

The System Safety Mailing List

This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender. You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or distribute its contents to any other person.

The System Safety Mailing List
systemsafety_at_xxxxxx Received on Mon Jan 04 2016 - 16:22:02 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Jun 04 2019 - 21:17:07 CEST