Re: [SystemSafety] Functional hazard analysis, does it work?

From: David MENTRE < >
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 09:21:33 +0100


Le 19/01/2016 08:49, Peter Bernard Ladkin a écrit :
> One way to formulate the criterion is to develop an ontology. The system consists of a collection
> of objects with properties and relations between them. List them. All. Then you can argue that
> functional hazards are those hazards which are expressible in that vocabulary and with a bit of
> luck and a lot of rigor you can list them all and show that you have done so.

Would you have a minimal example or a small reference I could look at to better understand your proposed approach?

Best regards,

The System Safety Mailing List
systemsafety_at_xxxxxx Received on Wed Jan 20 2016 - 09:21:40 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Jun 04 2019 - 21:17:07 CEST