Re: [SystemSafety] Modelling and coding guidelines: "Unambiguous Graphical Representation"

From: David MENTRÉ < >
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 13:25:58 +0100


Dear Mr Squair,

Le 2016-02-27 01:25, Matthew Squair a écrit :
> What about UML and SysML? Do they qualify or are they too loosey goosey?

Yes UML and SysML are too loose from my point of view. That's said, you could very well decide for a SysML and UML semantics in a given project and then they would qualify. The main issue with this approach is that you define your own semantics, not use the commonly used semantics of SDL or SCADE, thus limiting the scalability and usability of the approach (e.g. you need to tailor the tools to your semantics).

Sincerely yours,
D. Mentré



The System Safety Mailing List
systemsafety_at_xxxxxx Received on Sat Feb 27 2016 - 13:26:05 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun Apr 21 2019 - 00:17:08 CEST