Re: [SystemSafety] Modelling and coding guidelines: "Unambiguous Graphical Representation"

From: Derek M Jones < >
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 16:09:39 +0000


Sorry for the delay in replaying. My spam filter suddenly decided that this list is sending spam.

> "You seem to be willfully refusing to deal with a reality that does
> not conform to your ideal view of how the world should be."
> This is the crux of where we differ, I guess. Yes, you are entirely
> concerned with how software *is* practiced today. And I respect that.

I think how we differ is in our willingness to accept that it is ok to trade-off faults in delivered software for the opportunity of making money.

> "Ok. Can I have a copy of your data please. I would be happy to
> analyze and write about your success."
> Unfortunately I don't have detailed to-the-person-hour data for these
> projects. Besides, that data would almost certainly be considered
> proprietary by the organization in question. That said, however, here's

A very common problem in empirical software engineering.

> data that I can give you:

> Is this enough data? Or, do you need more?

This is not data anymore than a list of unsuccessful projects is data.

Software engineering researchers need to start thinking big. NASA spends billions for a few snaps of a distant planet. What about spending a few tens of millions on a project where the same system is implemented using various techniques, with lots of data being gathered.

Derek M. Jones           Software analysis
tel: +44 (0)1252 520667
The System Safety Mailing List
Received on Tue Mar 08 2016 - 17:09:17 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Jun 04 2019 - 21:17:08 CEST